July 27 2 008
Liberate divine treasure
What nice word truth?, it sounds up to good in mouth of the one who does not practise it.
I will speak about that, about freedom: liberate to express myself?, no, it is not a question of that, for that I do not need the approval of anybody, because I will exercise it, him despite the one who weighs him: liberate to defend me?, neither I believe that it has to defend ideas on that others comment, it is sufficient in spite of being consistent with mine: perhaps liberate of sex, of religion, of political ideas? Definitely, these freedoms, all of them usually finish in the stupid idea of debates, which only they lead to intransigence positions, with what there are no authentic freedoms. Definitivamente, esas libertades, todas ellas suelen acabar en la estúpida idea de debates, que solo conducen a posturas de intransigencia, con lo que no son libertades autenticas.
The Freedom about which I speak I believe that it is superficially enclosed of us, of our ideals, of the feelings, of the political ideas or of learning inculcated for ours … called major, of the favoritism and its defense or of any absurd thought, of which we have the only truth of what we believe that it belongs to one or to another certain way, and to this to add, that there is something that we always forget when we speak about freedom, for a simple reason, and is because we are only, in most of the occasions, capable of seeing our freedom, without bearing in mind that the freedom is for all the same one and is so linked to the respect, that almost we might say that we speak about the same caperucita dressed in a suit or other of wolf, and mention the wolf, because it scares to have to assume it.
It is a question of something so simple like the “freedom of the others”, to think, in each and everyone of its tones, to think to please, to face positions opposite to our ideas, even of doing our allegories: perhaps this person is not free to be able to appear to the world with what to its understanding it identifies him? If truth: and if we have been capable of doing this criticism?: Why not to accept that others have the same right to do it of us?..
To censure what others argue or simply they say because we should not agree or looks like to us an affront, do not deceive yourselves it is not a freedom, not so even for us. This alone is an intransigence. To affirm categorically, that simply for the words of anybody, said in a way that we do not like, it is not to defend the reason, but the injustice of not being capable of observing this person and for a second fraction to put ourselves in its position, after all : what more gives its opinion if we are only capable of accepting ours?, since we are wrong, and I the first one, because of these positions radically so opposite to ours we can learn more that of the slap in the back or of “that nice you had left”, and for my part I prefer to meet my enemy, and not to limit myself to accepting simply the one who is already my friend, because of course the one who disappoints me more deeply, will not be that that offends me without meeting me, but the one that says that he loves me., pues nos equivocamos, y yo el primero, porque de esas posturas radicalmente tan opuestas a la nuestra podemos aprender mas que de la palmadita en la espalda o de “que bonito te quedó”, y por mi parte prefiero conocer a mi enemigo, y no limitarme simplemente a aceptar a quien ya es mi amigo, porque seguramente quien me decepcione mas profundamente, no será aquel que me ofende sin conocerme, sino el que dice que me quiere.
I think to defend the freedom of the one who is, to say about me what he should want preferring it to any radical position of the one who is not in accordance with what is said about me, for the simplest reason, from which I do not need to defend myself and accept this defense would mean to make me guilty of facts, attitudes and ideas that me do not belong.
I think categorically to defend my freedom, and that of my opposite with so much force like mine, because this is what I will do with my freedom, to use it to learn of each one of those who should say, both positive things and denials of my peculiar way of feeling, of undressing me before the people and of showing my feelings, my weaknesses, my ideas and prejudices, of showing my complexes, of writing my thoughts, and do it with enough valor of not seeing in this criticism by a personal attack, but simply a distant opinion about mine.
I have asked all my writings to resign, because I believe that you have harmed use of my freedom on having written and I have asked that comments should not be accepted to this writing, more that to a mail address, which soon you will be very familiar, I think to answer particularly to each one of that it should seem to you that you have something that to think about my decision to write this article, or of what I say in.
I do not retire, I never leave anything that he considers that it is worth it, and believe that this place is adapted to be able to expand my worries or feelings, appear to the nude how I did already, without anything to conceal, but also without anything than to be afraid of the criticism.
I wait for respect, to whom it should be, and especially to its opinions, likewise I give it. After all as he was saying that lorencito … I should put myself as I put myself, for … I have it pekeña …
A greeting to all, and if it feels like to you for the direction where writing myself in this occasion and only in this one, is:
webmaster@estamos-todos.es
